Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- fictiewerk [2008/05/15 18:30] – femke
+++ fictiewerk [2017/02/09 13:23] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 La fiction est indispensable pour pouvoir manipuler la multiplication des profils, les traces que nous laissons et rassemblons. Si nous les interprètons en tant que scénarios d’identité que nous respectons, que racontons-nous alors ? Quelles fictions de réalité produisons-nous si nous mentons dans un formulaire ou si nous ‘arrangeons’ une réalité ? Comment nous faisons-nous une idée claire du parcours que nos profils suivent par les bases de données ?
@@ Line 34: / Line 38: @@
 ====== Notities ======
+[[http://data.constantvzw.org/future/documents/fictie-werktuig.pdf | Notes en Cadavre Exquis (PDF document)]]
 Pierre, Peter, Kris, Wendy, Nicolas, Nicolas, Michel, Femke
@@ Line 185: / Line 191: @@
 P: what kind of stories -- story as a medium
-if everything is fiction we can maybe change things. is everything rhetoric?
+if everything is fiction we can maybe change things. is everything rhetoric? By looking at rhetoric we can start to see what stories mean
+rhetoric as internal 'efficace'
+histories are stories = fiction
+how can you think about history as fiction, you give the key to see that it is a construction
+everything is a tool > there is always something in a story; we can enjoy a story we are not agreeing with.
 can you influence views by influencing stories
 stitch and split ... otherness
+rethoriek = woordenkramerij. it is a persuasion -- more ethical. You can make yourself and others aware
+manufactured tools do not help me to construct other tools
+what kind of construction, empowering
+being a strategical user... are you empowered?
+being transformed by a fiction ... in some sort of stable way ... how it is empowering
+Na: i was not thinking of GB but I was thinking of Brico...
+W: we are fictionalizing fiction.
+Pi: theory is about storyte"lling, when writing you dont think anymore, working on a workshop fiction writing for radio, wanting to engage radiomakers to revalidate fiction
+ni: fictions that work and fictions that do not work, fictions are sometimes inside the wrong genre,
+when do they dis / appear, you are talking about all kinds of aspects when thinking about disappearing media .....
+attention,
+is radio drama moved elsewhere, or is it no/somewhere?
+when we talk about tools we have to talk about their re-configuration,
+an: opening the box doesn't make you constructive / creative
+open source tools ?
+fe: spreekt over notaties van an in boeken die ze leest, daarin is een aandacht besloten die haar niet duidelijk is maar die intrigeert
+ni: when we speak about bookmarks it is a good moment to change to shiftspace,
+an: i wrote a fictional story through shiftspace post=its, people can leave comments, thepos-its are on urls, placed in the context of wenbpages,
+next phase includes thinking about the software as a tool for net-native writing
+organise two workshops ... with volunteers
+by following the trails ... temporality
+precise narration
+A: one criteria was, that it should be fiction, not just narrative. but it can be associative.
+when you talk about the project ... you don't mention what the story is about.
+Ni: i would like to know more about the story
+A: I was curious about how you make a novel, was caught by it. I had the desire to make one myself, but the context of the classic novel needed another kind of context
+i am curious about co-authorship
+but i have a story to tell
+Ni: if the meeting point for the story is the structure but not the story itself
+Oulipo is a safe game
+strategies for collaborative writing are often distant.
+collaborative projects in literature... ask long term investment
+free jazz and stories are not exclusive?
+groups that all together write software
+how is that different from writing a novel
+Ni: the difference is that code can be benchmarked... you can reach a consensus based on "it works better"
+the level of consensus is much higher
+we don't want to have the same tools as we had before
+collaborative writing
+all stories are already written
+Na: An, is your idea of participative collaborative digital writing constrained by tools -- or is it a  way to feed, learn the way you are learning.
+when you write a story it is difficult to make decisions -- to deal with all the possibilities you have
+participative writing can help to give some material constraints, that are not external but part of the process
+if you don't define the type of advantages you expect... can produce anything
+problem with free collaborative projects... over time, people come in to say hello and than spammers...
+Na: experimentations are always done in precise ways... you try to create a device
+MIT ... a teacher assigned characters to people
+who decides the structure ;-) you need limitations
+W: science of future studies
+structured speculation
+what is under collaborative discussion and what not
+if it is important to give different perspectives... but on what?
+there is a movie... la valse (sliding doors), constructed around a meeting